Paperity: Acceso abierto y via dorada

Originalmente publicado en Investigación científica en abierto:

Paperity, plataforma que da acceso a más de 2000 revistas. Las características de este proyecto son:

  •  Multidisciplinaridad. Ofrece el acceso a texto completo de artículos de diferentes areas del conocimiento. Su filosofía es similar a la de PubMed Central del area de biomedicina.
  • Acceso Abierto. Recoge la información de las revistas de Acceso Abierto, de vía dorada, lo que permite un acceso real a los pdf publicados. Recoge la información directamente de las editoras y no de los repositorios, ya que en algunas ocasiones, estos últimos no dan accesibilidad a todos sus materiales.
  • Peer-reviewed. Se compromoten a ofrece exclusivamente material revisado.

Las editoras pueden colaborar con Paperity, y está en desarrollo nuevas funcionalidades que complementen el proyecto recién inaugurado en este mes de octubre.


Ver original

¿Tu vida entera está en internet? (vídeo 2′:29”)

“Esclavos con corbata” Reflexión en @LaVanguardia ¿Cómo pueden algunos jóvenes profesionales conciliar trabajo y #family ?


How to marking essays? #writing #education @TomorrowsProf

Very useful tips from a veteran teacher (Brian Martin).

Marking (Grading) Essays: Making it Easier and More Fun

It’s worthwhile discovering methods to make marking more enjoyable. The same methods can be used to tackle other dreaded tasks.

Sitting on your desk is a pile of essays that need to be marked. There might be just 10 or 20, or maybe 50, 100 or more. For most teachers, this is not an eagerly awaited task. Is there some way to make marking easier and more enjoyable?

I’ve been marking undergraduate essays for over 25 years and have tried out various methods to make the task less onerous. Gradually I’ve discovered ways that work well for me. You may or may not want to adapt these for your own circumstances. In any case, I encourage you to undertake your own search for better methods. If you’re looking ahead at 25 years of marking, surely it’s worthwhile to explore better ways to go about it.


Because marking is generally seen as unpleasant, it is very common to postpone starting. Doing other things, such as reading a book, checking emails, searching the web or even doing housework, suddenly seems more appealing. After all, it really won’t matter much if you start tomorrow. Days and sometimes weeks go by until it becomes urgent to do the marking. Then it becomes a matter of long exhausting hours of mental labour. It seems like a marathon, and only goes to prove that it really was something to be avoided.

The habits of procrastination and bingeing are deep-seated. Most teachers learned them when they were students, cramming for exams or doing all-nighters to write essays.

The solution to the syndrome of procrastination and binge marking is simple: tackle just a few essays each day. If I have 80 essays and need to finish marking them in two weeks, I set myself a target of six every day. Six essays seem much less daunting than 80.

The hard part is getting started. It’s best to begin marking the very first day or, if some essays come in early, before the due date.

Robert Boice researched the habits of highly productive new academics, and found the secret of success was working in moderation. Academics who did a little every day – research, writing, class preparation – were vastly more productive than those who waited for big blocks of time to complete tasks in lengthy sessions. Furthermore, the ones who worked in moderation were less stressed.

I can’t tell you how to change habits of procrastination and bingeing; you can learn a lot from various self-help books. All I can say is that it’s one of the most important things you can do to make marking easier.

Staying fresh

My goal is to approach each essay feeling fresh and positive. Doing only a moderate number of essays per day helps. So does taking breaks. After marking one or two essays, I’ll take a break: a stretch, a snack, some research work, some reading, perhaps the dishes.

If I’m doing only an hour’s worth of marking per day, a break may not be needed. For anything longer, breaks are vital.

Marking requires mental effort, and the mind behaves like a muscle. Do too much and it gets tired and cries out in pain. Do the right amount and it gets stronger day by day. This is another reason for pacing: marking gradually becomes easier. So often it’s better to start with a few essays on the first day and increase the daily target later.

Going faster

How long does it take to mark an essay? A few teachers I’ve met may spend an hour or more, reading and rereading the essay, writing lengthy comments and agonising over the mark. My goal, though, is to go faster while maintaining quality.

Many people read at 200 to 300 words per minute. Yet it is possible to read several times this fast while maintaining comprehension. To do this requires practice, going a little bit faster until it seems natural, and then pushing to go faster still.

Going faster is similar to progressive training of the body, with greater speed or strength developing over time. It’s also similar to typists who train so they can achieve amazing speeds with great accuracy.

My aim is to be fresh and to maintain concentration so I need to read an essay only once and retain a short-term memory of it, perhaps jotting down a few notes along the way. I then type all my comments. If I feel a need to read the essay again, it usually means I haven’t maintained concentration. Time for a break.

Marking less

Even the most efficient marker can be daunted by the prospect of hundreds of essays. If you have some control over assessments, then there are ways to cut back on the marking load.

One option is to simply reduce the number of assignments. Students are often overloaded with work, and could do a better job on fewer assignments, putting more effort into each one.

Another option is to mark some student performance during class. I used to have students do short oral presentations. With a simple template, I would scribble feedback on a sheet of paper and give this to the students at the end of the class. One advantage for students was getting feedback promptly, which seldom happens with essays.

Yet another option is to have frequent small assignments, but only mark some of them. For example, in one class students had to write eight mini-essays, one per week. However, only two these were marked, in weeks chosen randomly after weeks four and eight. Some students complained that they wanted all their submissions marked; I responded by saying that marking just two of them was equivalent to having an exam in which only two of eight possible questions were asked.

Another source of essay marking overload is writing too many comments. I discovered that some students were discouraged by too much red ink. Others never bothered to read my comments at all. In one case a student – one of the weakest in the class – glanced at the mark and immediately deposited the essay in the rubbish bin. All the effort I had put into commenting on strengths and weaknesses was for naught.

For final assignments, some of my colleagues have a policy of asking students to say in advance whether they want comments. Students who don’t ask just receive a mark.

Years ago, I used to correct spelling and grammar as well as give comments on content. But I don’t teach English composition, so why become a proofreader? So I stopped giving detailed feedback on expression, and concentrate on content.

My current system is to write brief comments on each assessment criterion, mentioning strengths and ways to improve, and to supplement this with “general comments” that are generic for the whole class. The general comments explain my expectations and elaborate on how essays could be better. I say in my feedback that if my specific comments don’t say anything about a particular aspect of the assignment, then the student should look to the general comments. This approach avoids the need to write the same comments on essay after essay.

Varied assignments

Monotony is a great source of pain in marking. If there are 50 essays each answering the question “What are the factors behind the rise of social media?” the task quickly becomes tedious. If you are marking essays for someone else’s class and have no control over essay questions, you have my sympathies. Luckily, I’ve usually been able to set my own assignment topics. One of my goals has been to make it interesting for me to mark essays – even the ones that aren’t so good.

Thinking up assignments that are stimulating for students to carry out and for me to mark is not easy, but it has been worthwhile. Two ways of doing this are to give students quite a bit of choice in their topics and to invite or require them to use unconventional formats.

In an environmental politics class, we covered a series of topics such as sustainable development and the precautionary principle. Each week I asked the students to write a comment on that week’s environmental topic using a randomly chosen political, economic or other theory or framework, such as liberalism, militarism, feminism or Buddhism. Then for the final assignment, students had to write a dialogue between two characters, as in a script for a play, with footnotes as appropriate. Each character had to represent or embody some theory, for example Mao Tse-Tung for Marxism and Gandhi for pacifism. The characters had to discuss some environmental topic. So one possible dialogue would be between Mao and Gandhi discussing sustainable development.

For marking purposes, this assignment was delightful. Every submission was different, and many students were creative in their choices. One student crafted a discussion between Thomas the Tank Engine and Percy the Small Engine. Percy was a Rastafarian and used rasta slang; footnotes explained unusual terms.

When designing such unorthodox assignments, it can be challenging to explain to students exactly what is expected. I’ve found a fairly good method: with students’ permission, I post top assignments from previous years on my website. These show the format expected, for example a dialogue, and by demonstrating really good work can provide an inspiration to do well.

Designing an assignment that is interesting to mark has a spin-off effect. It can change the mode of covering the content. In many cases, I’ve found it effective to let students investigate topics themselves rather than me delivering lectures. For the environmental politics class, we had an excellent textbook for the environmental topics, and I let the students (many of whom were doing an environmental science degree) look up topics like liberalism and Buddhism on their own.

To some, this might seem to be abdicating a teacher’s responsibility to provide authoritative perspectives on content. For me, it is part of encouraging students to learn on their own, including finding relevant readings, understanding concepts and applying them to case studies.

In making marking more enjoyable, I also hope to make learning more enjoyable for students. By getting students to do more work on their own and tackle unorthodox assignments, I hope to encourage student creativity and initiative. I remind myself that for the teacher to work hard often is not all that relevant to student learning. Students learn more when they work hard, and they are more likely to work hard on an interesting assignment. When the assignment is interesting to both students and the teacher, it is a win-win solution.

Other applications

If marking can be made reasonably enjoyable, what about other dreaded tasks? What is dreaded depends on the person, and might be paperwork filing, housework, gardening, tax returns or practising the violin. Often it’s whatever you’re avoiding. Whatever the challenge, the same sorts of principles can be applied.

1. Work in moderation, a little bit each day, rather than procrastinating and bingeing.

2. Remain fresh and alert by taking breaks when needed.

3. Practise going a bit faster while maintaining quality.

4. Aim to do what’s good enough, not at perfection.

5. Redesign the task to make it more interesting.

Brian Martin

Further reading

Robert Boice, Advice for New Faculty Members: Nihil Nimus (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2000): on moderation as a philosophy for academic work.

Charles Duhigg, The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business (New York: Random House, 2012): a fascinating account including advice on changing habits. (See Brian’s commentary.) subject outlines and outstanding student work illustrating unusual types of assignments.

Acknowledgements Thanks to Paula Arvela, Don Eldridge, Kathy Flynn and Anne Melano for helpful comments.

Términos relacionados con el temido ébola

La Fundéu nos recuerda qué términos y expresiones son correctas y adecuadas al tratar del virus ébola.

Con motivo de la expansión del virus del Ébola, se ofrecen las siguientes claves para una buena redacción de las noticias relacionadas:

1. La palabra ébola se escribe con inicial minúscula cuando se emplea de manera informal para hacer referencia a la enfermedad causada por el virus del mismo nombre, tal y como indica la Ortografía académica.

2. Para denominar al virus, se recomienda escribirlo con artículo determinado en masculino y con mayúscula inicial (virus del Ébola) por tratarse del nombre propio del río en el que se aisló por primera vez. A veces, por influencia del inglés, aparece sin la preposición (virus Ébola), uso que se desaconseja en español.

3. Antiébola, junto y sin guion, es la forma apropiada para referirse a los tratamientos, vacunas o protocolos empleados contra este virus, ya sea para evitar su propagación o para tratar la enfermedad.

4. Viral y vírico pueden utilizarse indistintamente, ya que se consideran sinónimos. En caso de aludir al tratamiento que se utiliza para combatir el virus, tanto antiviral como antivírico, ambas escritas sin guion, son las formas adecuadas que recoge el Diccionario de la lengua española.

5. EPI, en mayúsculas, es la sigla que hace referencia a los equipos de protección individual que están utilizando los sanitarios que tratan a pacientes infectados.

6. Esclusa, y no exclusa, es el término apropiado para denominar la zona que existe entre la habitación del enfermo infectado y la zona no restringida, y en la que los sanitarios se ponen y se quitan los equipos de protección individual.

7. La técnica sanitaria es el femenino adecuado de el técnico sanitario, para hacer alusión a la auxiliar de enfermería contagiada de ébola en España.

8. Suero hiperinmune, junto y sin guion, es una construcción válida para referirse al tratamiento experimental que se está empleando para combatir la enfermedad infecciosa y que contiene anticuerpos obtenidos de personas cuyo organismo ha creado una respuesta inmunitaria. Este suero se obtiene del plasma de la sangre de un paciente que ha superado la enfermedad, por lo que es frecuente encontrar ejemplos en los que se hace referencia a él simplemente como plasma.

9. Diagnosticar una enfermedad a una persona es una expresión más apropiada que diagnosticar a una persona de una enfermedad, que resulta inadecuada de acuerdo con el significado de este verbo.

10. El término mortalidad hace referencia a la tasa de muertes en un tiempo dado, mientras que mortandad es una gran cantidad de muertes causadas por epidemia u otro desastre. Aunque la expresión tasa de mortalidad es válida, se recuerda que puede hablarse simplemente de mortalidad, ya que su significado lleva implícito que se trata de una tasa.

11. Epidemia y pandemia no pueden utilizarse como sinónimos, se considera que una epidemia se propaga por un país durante un tiempo, mientras que una pandemia se extiende a otros países, tal como señala el Diccionario académico.

12. El verbo cursar, en el ámbito de la medicina, se refiere a la enfermedad o a sus síntomas, no al enfermo.

13. Sacrificar es un término más adecuado que eutanasiar para referirse al perro de la paciente contagiada en España. Aun así, eutanasiar puede considerarse un verbo bien formado y con cierto uso en el ámbito veterinario.

14. Alta va precedido por el artículo el si funciona como sustantivo («el alta médica»), mientras que, si se emplea como adjetivo, lo apropiado es anteponer la forma la («la alta fiebre»).

15. Dar de alta y dar el alta son expresiones que se construyen con diferentes pronombres: lo(s) y la(s) en el primer caso («La/lo dio de alta») y le(s) en el segundo («Le dio el alta»).

De nuevo, la poderosa fuerza de la coma (ejemplos y ejemplos).

El verbo “rehúyen” lleva acento

Antes de destar un acalorado debate en el aula, el Diccionario Panhispánico de dudas nos recuerda que algunas formas del verbo “rehuir” llevan tilde:

rehuir. 1. Verbo irregular: se conjuga como construir (apéndice 1, n.º 25). En cuanto a la acentuación de la secuencia vocálica /eu/, sigue el modelo de rehusar (apéndice 1, n.º 15), esto es, la -u- es tónica en las formas de este verbo que llevan el acento prosódico en la raíz; por lo tanto, en estos casos, la u debe escribirse con tilde para marcar el hiato ( tilde2, 2.2.2b): rehúyo, rehúyes, rehúye, rehúyen; rehúya, rehúyas, rehúyan. Las formas rehuísrehuí llevan acento gráfico, porque son bisílabas agudas terminadas en -s y en vocal, respectivamente. Por el contrario, el participio, rehuido, se escribe sin tilde (tilde2, 2.1.1 y 2.1.2).


  • 127,557 hits



Recibe cada nueva publicación en tu buzón de correo electrónico.

Únete a otros 287 seguidores